City of Fullerton City Council meeting June 17th, 2025

Public Comments

Todd Harrison: I want to revisit a topic I introduced in my earlier remarks regarding the endangered residents of Rancho La Paz, as well as my connection to Fullerton as a resident.

This is a misguided effort to adopt a city charter that would classify us as a charter city. I recently read the Observer and noted that Mayor Jung made some comments and raised questions about the Charter City initiative during the State of Fullerton address. It’s important to remember that this process isn’t free. As I often point out during my time on the Senior Citizen Advisory Committee, our meetings take up valuable staff time. There are three or four city employees dedicated to supporting our committee, which diverts their attention from other essential responsibilities.

I anticipate that this initiative will ultimately lead to significant expenditures for the city, particularly in consultant fees. I’m not sure how much these services will cost; city staff might have better insights. However, I doubt that hiring political or legal advisors ever comes at a low price—typically, these costs total tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of dollars. I worry that the city will end up spending a considerable amount of money on this effort, which many residents find to be unnecessary.

It seems to many in the community that this initiative is more about consolidating and centralizing power within City Hall than about addressing the concerns it claims to tackle. Therefore, it’s not surprising that the answers you provide to our questions often seem vague; they may reflect a hesitance to reveal the true motivations behind this push for a charter city.

Yolanda Harrison: Good evening, everyone. It was wonderful to see Doctor Charles and Council Member Sarah at Pride, as well as Doctor Charles’s husband at the No King’s protest. It was truly heartening. Early estimates suggest that around 13,000 people attended at La Palma Park, and I am proud of every single person who showed up.

However, I want to address the proposal for a Charter City. This is a bad idea. Fullerton is already financially strapped, to put it mildly. Our streets need urgent attention, especially at the intersection of Lemon and Valencia. Weren’t there plans to fix that corner this year? I was told that there would be a dedicated left turn lane and a protected right turn lane put in place by next summer for the upcoming school year. Yet, nothing has been done.

The kids are nearly out of school; why aren’t the roads being fixed? The streetlights on Valencia between Lemon and Harbor are not functioning, making that area very dark. Children walk to and from school there, as well as in other areas beneath the train bridges, which are in terrible condition.

There are so many aspects of Fullerton that need improvement, yet we are considering spending money on a charter? The city should not become a charter city; we need to focus on necessary repairs and ensuring the streets are safe. For instance, the curb cuts are not safe either. I recently had a frustrating experience in Anaheim where my vehicle was damaged once again. If it hadn’t been for the five people I was with, who were heading to the protest, I would have been stuck.

Please reconsider how you allocate our funds, Mr. Mayor. We have much better uses for that money than pursuing the idea of a charter city.

Elijah Manassero: Last week, the Planning Commission was scheduled to hear an appeal regarding a proposed gas station near Provecho Market. The applicant, Ralph Kim, is a political donor to Mayor Jung. While the application was denied, I reviewed the staff report and found several serious concerns that need to be addressed publicly.

According to the Fullerton Municipal Code, a gas station may only be built if one of two conditions is met: the location must be at the intersection of two arterial highways, or the structure must be an accessory use. This project meets neither of those criteria. The location is not at an arterial intersection, and to qualify as an accessory use, the gas station would need to be for the exclusive use of the occupants of the premises, not for the general public.

The staff report acknowledges that the location does not meet the arterial intersection requirement, yet it implies that the gas station might qualify as an accessory use without stating this clearly. Instead of citing the municipal code, the report relies on analogies from previous cases that are legally and factually different. This raises a troubling question: Why is staff implying legal compliance without clearly stating it?

Why is a recommendation being made that appears inconsistent with city law, especially for a project tied to a political donor? Is staff being pressured to produce certain outcomes? If staff are aware that this project does not meet legal requirements, as the language in the report subtly suggests, why is no one speaking up? Who approved this, and why?

The concern is not limited to just this case. Over the past year, we have seen questionable closed session classifications, land use decisions benefiting donors, and a lack of transparency in how some projects are prioritized or framed. These incidents form a pattern that cannot be ignored.

If there are individuals in city government who have been asked to approve, facilitate, or remain silent about decisions they know to be improper, I urge them to come forward. Speaking out may be difficult, but it is essential to protecting public trust. If speaking publicly feels unsafe, there are alternative channels available. Those aware of any impropriety, whether past or present, have a responsibility to act.

Jensen Hallstrom: I request that the council consider reviewing an overall update of our Urban Forest Management Plan. It has been nearly two years since it was approved, and there continue to be significant deficiencies in the management of our precious mature street trees, park trees, and even trees on private property. The city could do more to guide the conservation of these mature trees.

A Chase Bank is being constructed at Pomona and Chapman. Throughout the entire planning and permitting process, there was little concern or awareness of the value of many mature trees that the project would necessitate removing. This includes two native California Sycamore trees that are almost 50 feet tall and provide shade to the sidewalk frequently used by students at Fullerton High School. Additionally, some historic Magnolia trees, including one that dates back to the original 1920s planting, are also at risk.

Although an updated management plan was finalized, numerous deficiencies remain largely unaddressed. I have not seen any interest or initiative from the council to agendize a review of our urban forest management. This is a vital natural infrastructure and resource that is still relatively poorly understood. Mature trees are being cut down in our downtown area, which already has a significant shade deficit. Compared to other downtowns that have successfully conserved their mature trees and reaped the benefits, Fullerton continues to lose out each time a mature tree is unnecessarily removed.

Jose Trinidad Castaneda: I’m here to clarify the direction I would like to see the City Council take for our city. One of the main problems I observe is a lack of public trust in all levels of government—not just local but also state and federal. I urge the council to exercise restraint and uphold the integrity and public confidence that come with their positions.

I believe in the principle of “hate the sin, love the sinner.” It’s important to differentiate between an individual’s actions and the individual. I generally agree with the council, particularly as demonstrated in the consent calendar, where they often find consensus in most meetings. Therefore, I’m genuinely shocked when I hear comments like, “I don’t trust this council,” or accusations of a “corrupt majority.” Such statements undermine and erode public trust, not just within our city but across the entire region. We all need to do our part at every level of government to enhance public trust and integrity moving forward.

While we have a guaranteed right to public comment, there are also limits on real-time debate and dialogue between the council and the public. The Brown Act, specifically Government Code 549554.3, guarantees this and stipulates that council members should not engage in extensive back-and-forth discussions with speakers, especially on items that are not on the agenda. Instead, it allows for referrals to staff for future agendas without immediate deliberation.

I encourage the council to exercise the necessary restraint and avoid responding directly to demands from public comment at that moment. This is a requirement that every City Council and agency must follow under the Brown Act. It’s crucial to protect criticism at all costs, as it is fundamental to our democracy. If someone critiques you personally, it’s essential to remain silent. This is not just a suggestion; it’s a directive.

Again, public trust depends on adherence to these principles. We can all commit to this, especially during these unprecedented times.

Fullerton Resident: I recently attended my first Planning Commission meeting, and it was a refreshing experience. Every member of the commission actively listened to each speaker during their presentations, which felt respectful and encouraging. I hope this continues.

Tonight, I request that everyone on the council and all staff remain transparent, complete, and forthcoming when discussing the preparation of charters and all issues with the public and media.

I would also like feedback and fact-checking following my attendance of the State of the City at the Fullerton Collaborative meeting with Mayor Jung. When asked why we are pursuing a charter that could cost at least $100,000 while we are facing a budget deficit and considering cuts, Mayor Jung responded that we haven’t spent anything yet. He mentioned only the $8,500 needed to get it on the ballot. However, we have already incurred significant staff time and costs in preparing this initiative.

We are in the early stages of planning, which means any outside consultant fees or in-house costs are just beginning to accumulate. Mayor Jung mentioned that we haven’t made any cuts yet, but we have just passed a budget instructing all departments to make specific percentage cuts. While people may or may not be laid off, positions will remain unfilled as part of the required budget reductions. Therefore, saying we are not making cuts was misleading, as departments are figuring out how to implement these necessary reductions as voted on.

You indicated that there would be public meetings to solicit input. Still, it is crucial to note that the council will ultimately decide what goes into the charter, regardless of public feedback. While you mentioned wanting at least six public meetings, the final decision will still rest with the council majority. Without transparent and accurate information during these public meetings, the public will lack the necessary understanding to make informed decisions regarding this matter.

Additionally, when concerns about legal costs related to the charter were raised, you mentioned that Huntington Beach had won some of its lawsuits against the state. However, this does not negate the legal costs associated with pursuing those lawsuits, regardless of the outcome. Many still believe that adopting a charter will prevent certain issues, and I request further clarity on this matter. [The city clerk turned the microphone off because the three-minute time was up].

Fullerton Resident: Good evening, elected City Council members, department heads, and dedicated staff. Thank you for being here.

I’d like to bring attention to an event that took place on June 7th, which was a Ruck March on the Fullerton Loop. The Fullerton Police Department and the California National Guard sponsored this event. What was remarkable about this event was the genuine respect between our wonderful Police Chief, Jonathan Radius, and the commander of the National Guard. They demonstrated true collaboration in organizing this event.

Not only was it enjoyable, but they also provided food, and everyone had a great time. It was like going to the beach—everyone was happy! This event showcased what a city with humanity can accomplish. Approximately 250 community members attended. The Fire Department was also present, along with others, and it truly was an outstanding event.

Additionally, I want to mention that City Manager Eric Levitt has distributed his resume and accepted a position in San Bernardino. Previously, Chief Dunn, the former Fullerton Police Chief, secured a raise in his annual compensation but left our city shortly after to seek better opportunities elsewhere.

This raises a question: Why are we losing such wonderful service providers? I have a theory that the inefficiency of our city operations might be a contributing factor. Often, council meetings seem to rehash the same issues repeatedly, keeping people here until 11 or 11:30pm. I can only imagine how tiresome that must be, and it might lead some to look for positions in places where the work is more efficient and productive.

We need to focus on issues that directly impact our community, such as improving our sidewalks for the safety of our children. [The city clerk turned the microphone off because the three-minute time was up].

Maureen Milton: Independent advocate for the disabled, handicapped, little people, and the mobility challenged.

First of all, I have a quick question for Mayor Jung. I called in earlier to request that the item for library furniture on the consent calendar be pulled. I was told it was item 5. Is that correct, or did you receive my message? Can it still be pulled? I have an idea that might benefit everyone regarding the furniture. Additionally, much of Fullerton’s history is locked away in a closet. It would be nice to showcase this history, which is why I thought my idea could be a good fit. I don’t want to go into detail right now unless you’re interested, but I have a plan for how it could be done.

City Council Member Reports

City Council Member Nick Dunlap left the dais and did not return.

Council Member Dr. Ahmad Zahra: I know there is a lot of fear and anxiety in our communities, and these are truly hard times for everyone. I sincerely hope for peace at some point.

I would like to request a few things. First, if we could have our immigration policy published on our city website, it would provide clarity for our community. I know the Rochester Police Department has done a commendable job communicating with our residents, especially regarding our protest policy, and I appreciate their efforts. However, our city also owes it to our community to clarify our stance on local laws.

Additionally, I want to address the turmoil affecting our small businesses. It’s been years since I first requested a small business strategic plan, and while we’ve made some progress, we have yet to complete it. I believe it is essential that we revisit this and place it on the agenda to assess where we stand with our bridge strategic plan. We should also explore options to support our small businesses, whether through funding at the state, federal, or county level, as well as reviewing our own policies. I would like us to examine the outdoor dining and sidewalk rental fees to see what we can do to assist our small businesses.

I’m not sure if I need a second for that request, but I would like it to be addressed at the earliest convenience for our staff.

Furthermore, I believe the urban forest plan could use a quick update. Since it was approved two years ago, it would be beneficial to provide the community with a brief progress report. I’d also like to get an update on the traffic lights at Lemon and Valencia to see where we currently stand.

That’s all I have for today. I wish everyone peace and tranquility during these challenging times.

Mayor Protem Dr. Shana Charles: The past two weeks have been quite challenging for many of us. I would like to begin by sharing some of the official duties I have attended as Mayor Pro Tem. I participated in a Cal Cities Policy Committee meeting via Zoom, which focused on community services, particularly the availability of state park passes at our libraries. It was a wonderful and uplifting moment during the meeting. However, just three days later, I saw in the news that this initiative is one of the items slated to be cut from the state budget due to the ongoing deficit. It’s hard to hold onto these moments of positivity, but we need to cherish them while we can.

I also attended Pride, which I was very excited about, along with Council Member Zahra. Our Fullerton Fire Department and Police Department participated as well. It was a fantastic day of celebration, marking our fourth Pride event, and I am already looking forward to next year’s fifth celebration. Supporting our LGBTQ friends, neighbors, and family means a lot to me, and being an ally is incredibly important. If you missed this year’s event, I hope you will join us next year!

We have our Day of Music coming up this Saturday! Events like this truly bring communities together, and I hope to see you at one of the venues. There will be sixty different locations featuring over 200 musicians. Even if you attend 30 events and I attend 30 different ones, we will likely have unique experiences. I’m looking forward to an amazing day on Saturday, and I hope you are as well. Let’s take this opportunity to forget about the outside world and focus on the wonderful things happening in our community and at the Arboretum. I’m also excited that some of the Day of Music festivities will be taking place on the East Side this year!

I participated in a discussion about charter cities at Fullerton College, where I engaged in an academic conversation and had some of my questions answered. If you’re interested in learning more, Fullerton College is willing to provide the slides from the presentation. Additionally, the Fullerton Observer recorded the entire event, so you can watch it if you missed it. Click here to watch the Charter City workshop.

Last Saturday, I participated in two different No Kings rallies, one of which took place here in Fullerton. The event was advertised as running from 9am to 8pm, and I initially thought, “Oh my God, that’s impossible! Who would organize something like that?” But incredibly, it actually happened, and it went remarkably peacefully.

I was there early in the morning, and I know another council member arrived later in the day. Our Police Department kept us informed throughout the day about how the events unfolded. Different people came and went at various times. At one point, some attendees chose to march down to Commonwealth, following all traffic laws and exercising their First Amendment rights in the best way possible. It was wonderful to see Fullerton express its support for our immigrant friends and neighbors and voice its displeasure with current national events.

At the rally in Anaheim, I was asked to give a speech, so I delivered a three-minute address based on my experiences as both a council member and a professor at a Hispanic-serving institution. You can find the full speech on my social media pages: I posted it on my Instagram (@ShanaCharlesOfficial) and my Facebook (Shana Charles Council Member). You can also sign up for my newsletter to stay updated.

In my speech, I used words that were not entirely my own. Some of my statements came from Senator Alex Padilla, who was recently handcuffed for what appeared to be no reason at all. The video evidence is clear. I’ve had the privilege of meeting Senator Padilla several times, and I can assure you that he is one of the most dedicated public servants in our state. To see him treated in such a manner by someone who had previously interviewed him for her job makes no sense to me.

I also incorporated the perspectives of people in their 20s who I trust, as well as input from my colleagues in the profession. I quoted the American Pediatric Association when I referred to the situation as “state-sponsored child abuse.” Those words are not mine; they come from our professional organizations. The American Public Health Association, the oldest such organization in the United States, which has been around for 150 years, has already called for the resignation of the Health and Human Services Secretary—an unprecedented move. It’s crucial to speak out on these issues.

During my speech, I noticed comments on the Observer’s online coverage suggesting that some people I knew personally were dismissing the facts and accusing me of making baseless claims. I want to clarify that I was simply sharing the headlines report. These are not fabrications; they are facts. I encourage everyone to educate themselves on these matters. I’m more than happy to share articles if you want to email me, although it may not be easy to post them on Instagram. Please feel free to reach out anytime.

I hold open office hours on Thursdays from 12 to 2pm, and I hope to see you all at the Day of Music celebration. I am also looking forward to our July 4th event, which our staff is organizing. I’ll provide more details during our meeting on July 1st.

Council Member Jamie Valencia: I just wanted to let everybody know that I attended the Kaboom Playground project development last night with a bunch of residents in the area of super fun, lots of kids ideas. It’s really cute to hear what they have to say for the new playground. That’s off and running. We should have the project ready to start building September 11th and then complete on September 13th over at Union Park. Full disclosure though, the playground will be up but the children won’t be able to play on that until they’re rounding surrounding area is met code standards and stuff so just so you know, playground will be there, but until we get the go ahead from the city and won’t be able to be played on at that time.

I’m also looking forward to the Day of the Music and I’m also very much looking forward to the almost sold out event State of the City next Thursday and see what’s Fullerton has done in the past couple of years, it’ll be exciting to see, so thank you so much.

Mayor Fred Jung: My written reports included in the Supplemental. Madam Deputy City Manager, can we answer Councilman Zahra’s concerns about the traffic light at Lemon and Valencia. [Unfortunately, there is no report from the Mayor at the time of publishing this]

Deputy City Manager Daisy Perez:  Valencia Street is scheduled to be done in early August, there was a delay due to the long lead time for traffic signal poles.

Charles: With item 5 I just wanted to clarify for the commenter that what we’re voting on is to actually continue it to july 1st so we will be talking about it on july 1st that’s what’s voted on consent tonight.