Local News

Planning Commissioners say the ‘Bump’ Must Go

The planning commission hearing to approve a conditional use permit (CUP) for the restaurants replacing the Florentine establishments [at the corner of Harbor and Commonwealth] concluded with the commissioners adopting a resolution to ask the City Council to revoke an encroachment permit and restore the sidewalk.  The CUP was also approved in the February 16 session. The permit was for a structure referred to as “the bump,” a building addition occupying a six-foot-wide swath of public sidewalk on the north side of Commonwealth Avenue east of Harbor Boulevard since 2003.

The ‘bump’ is an encroachment on a six-foot-wide swath of public sidewalk on the north side of Commonwealth along the restaurant formerly known as Florentines. It is currently being remodeled for a new bar/restaurant.

The original agreement for this was written on the City form for “Outdoor Dining Encroachment Agreement” and signed by Tony Florentine and F. Paul Dudley as Acting Director of Redevelopment June 6, 2003. That document gave permission for “Enclosed addition to building.”  The City Council had given permission to Florentine for just a patio on May 3, 2003. The last amendment to this agreement was made in 2017, according to Greg Pfost, interim community development director.

Commission chair Douglas Cox questioned Associate Planner Christine Hernandez about the outdoor dining patio sited in the pedestrian walkway as an adjunct to the restaurants.  He and other commissioners were concerned that pedestrian access would be impeded. Hernandez said the outdoor dining space had already been approved in a “minor site plan hearing” and that the space met all “minimum requirements.”

Applicant and owner of Mickey’s Irish Pub and the High Horse Saloon, 100 and 102-104 North Harbor Boulevard Mario Marovic, said every City department had been consulted regarding the patio.  “There were multiple meetings…design review…civil engineers.  Light poles were moved at my expense.  It will be safer.”  He said planning this outdoor dining area started at the beginning of 2021.

Commissioner Arnel Dino asked who could cancel an encroachment permit. “The City Council,” City Attorney Scott Porter said.

Commissioner Peter Gambino, supporting restoration of the public sidewalk, said, “Look at the rest of the block, the set-backs, the shrubbery. This should have been addressed by staff.”  He cited information provided to the commissioners by this reporter. That information included a copy of the original agreement between Florentine and Dudley. Gambino noted that the Florentine agreement stated it was “not transferable.”

Chairman Cox said, “What you see today was not approved; it was a purely political decision by those elected to let it stand. The intent was never to have it enclosed.  There’s opportunity here,” he added.  “I think the City Council doesn’t know about this.  There is nothing in the bump-out now, everything has been removed.  We need to take action, the staff needs to warn the City Council that this is an issue, and they can decide to restore the sidewalk.” Pfost said the City can take back the encroachment for specified reasons.

Commissioner Wayne Carvalho also asked, regarding “the bump,” “How come this never came up with the staff?” He questioned the patio space as to clearance for the doors and pedestrian access. He noted the similar Mulberry Street outdoor dining encroachment in a pedestrian walkway that had been decided by the planning commission.   Hernandez said all guidelines were met.  Carvalho asked about barriers. Hernandez said yes, there may be a wall there, concrete or wrought iron.  She said that the outdoor dining patio application “went through all departments” and that all departments were represented at all meetings regarding the patio extension including Public Works. “We all reviewed the proposal. It meets the minimum requirements.”

“That’s all that’s required, four feet for pedestrians?” Carvalho said, referring to Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. “That’s all, four feet,” Hernandez said.  “Public Works and Traffic reviewed this.”

In public comment, Jane Reifer questioned whether it makes sense to hand over public right-of-way for private profit.  She pointed out that the area provides pedestrian access from Commonwealth Avenue all the way to Wilshire Avenue. Reifer said that use of that pedestrian pathway should have been reviewed by the Active Transportation Commission, which deals with pedestrian issues.

Commissioner Gambino asked, “Public Works–they did not ask about restoring Commonwealth Avenue? Did the city engineer?”

Hernandez said, “The people under the city engineer, who has been here one year, were present at the meetings.”

Applicant Marovic was given three opportunities to address the commission and to respond to the various comments. “I didn’t have to come here tonight,” Marovic said.  “I’m only here for the updated CUP.  The plans (for the patio dining) were approved, the furniture is in place.  I have invested a lot of time and money.  Being a slum lord is profitable.”  He cited the various repairs he was making to roof and utilities.  “We are investing because we love Fullerton.  We want to have a positive impact on the community.”

An appeal of the commission’s grant of the CUP was filed February 25 by Ken Bane, Matt Leslie, Jane Rands, Jane Reifer, and this reporter.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Protect local journalism – please subscribe to the print edition or online edition of the Fullerton Observer. All editions are free, but we depend on subscriptions from readers.  Annual subscription is only $39/year. It only takes a minute – Click Here To Subscribe. Thank you for your support for the Fullerton Observer. Click here to view a copy of the print edition.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

6 replies »

  1. Many questions here.

    1) He called himself a slum lord? How does that make sense in the context of his comments?

    2) The CUP was approved which presumably means the bump is part of that, but at the same time the commission attached a request to the city council to revoke the bump? Why is it not possible for the commission to do this, since it seems like they are against it? And why approve it at all, if they are against it?

    3) The reporter has made themselves a part of the story, which seems unusual. I get that this is a small community newspaper and not the New York Times, but it seems weird to have your own people be part of the story. At a minimum, wouldn’t this be more opinion than news?

    • Where is opinion? I reported what people said.
      I have been part of the Florentine story since Tony and Joe cursed me and the city development director punished me for revealing his grant of a building addition by having his staff ok a dog kennel next door, four to six feet from my house and rental units.

      “Slum lord” Then he said what repairs he was making, spending lots of money, implying the previous owner was a slum lord.

      The “bump” is an encroachment agreement, originally a permit for a “building addition” on a city form for “outdoor dining.” Amended twice. Not transferable to anyone after Florentine. And the agreement was cancelable but only by the city council.

      Judith A. Kaluzny

      • Many folks have forgotten the sordid history of this “bump out.” It was a theft, papered over by F. Paul Dudley and the then City Council of Dick Jones, Don Bankhead, Mike Clesceri, Leland Wilson and of course, Shawn Nelson.

        Dudley had no authority to alter the terms of the lease agreement on his own, nor to allow a permanent structure on a public right of way. This was not just about a “permit.” After the proverbial hue and cry died down, the City Council quietly revised the terms of the lease hoping the embarrassment would go away forever. But how could it? .

        Staff deliberately led the Planning Commission to believe that the property owner had a revised lease agreement from 2017 with the City. This was a lie that was never questioned (of course – bad form). The revised lease of 2017 was with Florentine to adjust the rent amount. And at that point (2017) Marovic may not even have owned the building. Misleading public bodies in Fullerton is an age old and unfortunately honored tradition.

        The facts of the matter are simple. Per the lease agreement, Florentine has defaulted by cutting out. He is responsible legally for getting his building off the public sidewalk. The City can go after “Intimate Inns of California” (if it still exists) for damages. It can also keep the “improvements” and rent them to Marovic at market rate (he charges his tenants at least $3 per sq. ft. If the City decides to get rid of the encroachment and not pursue Florentine, the taxpayers will have to pay to remove the building and repair Marovic’s storefront.

        What a mess. And you can thank one of your $100,000 pension club members, F. Paul Dudley, and his bosses on the council for this mess. And don’t forget, your esteemed, Teflon-coated City Attorney Dick Jones presided over all of this fiasco. And all to placate the Florentine crew.

        Fullerton.

  2. While we are on the subject of property redevelopment, how about we do something about the empty Zakie Market building on Pacific Drive and Orangethorpe Ave. Buy the property and turn it into something. It has been over a decade and no one wants to do anything with it. Turn it into a credit union or another restaurant. The Newport Dental and former Taqueria El Rancho locales need love too. Think Fullertonians.

  3. I was so sad to see the unique Zakie Market leave town. I miss it and Mike and Nancy. Being right next to a school it would have made a good community center in that part of town. But the city didn’t go for it. I can’t believe it has been empty so long.

    • Unfortunately, the former F&M Bank/Zakie Market is now a magnet for crack addict transients and wannabe barrio punks. The 91 Freeway underpasses are home to transients and pigeons alike, on the other side of the 91 Freeway is Mordor. The longer we keep having neglected lots like this in Fullerton, the more it is going to look like Anacrime.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.