Will Council Restore Public Right-of-Way at 100 N. Harbor?

Restoration of the public right-of-way at 100 North Harbor Boulevard is anticipated for an upcoming City Council vote. The restoration involves removing an encroachment from the public sidewalk on Commonwealth Avenue.  Permission for this building addition was given to Tony Florentine on June 6, 2003, by then-acting redevelopment director Paul Dudley. At all times, the City has by written agreement reserved the right to restore the public right-of-way at the owner’s expense. The building’s new owner, Mario Marovic, has recently renovated the encroachment as part of a new bar.

Construction on the encroachment in May of 2022 at 100 N. Harbor. Photo by Jesse La Tour.

Below we re-print the original article about the origin of this issue, by Judith Kaluzny, published in the July 2003 issue of the Fullerton Observer.

The Concrete Wall Downtown

by Judith Kaluzny

Approval to build a 6-inch-high patio that later turned out to include a 4-foot block wall enclosing a wide swath of City sidewalk on Commonwealth at Harbor in downtown Fullerton was given to “Intimate Inns of California, Inc., doing business as Florentine’s Downtown Bar and Grill,” in a unanimous City Council vote May 6, 2003.

Although a sign and two trees were removed for the construction and the sidewalk was reduced from 12-feet to 6-feet wide, Florentine’s application was not sent to the Planning Commission for discussion.

According to City officials, encroachment issues are often approved without public discussion. Florentine’s project was referred to the City Council by staff because it was thought that it would be controversial.

However, the Agenda information sheet No.14, which was presented to Council members, the public, and the press, failed to include diagrams, figures, or even a description of the concrete block wall running down the middle of the sidewalk.  Instead, Council was shown an artist’s rendering that was not made available for publication and was not included in the Agenda backup information. Hopefully such vital details are not routinely omitted since our representatives must make decisions based on the facts given to them by staff.

The two-page information sheet paired Florentine’s “raised concrete deck, approximately 6-inches high” with the  encroachment application for St. Jude Medical Center’s pedestrian overpass  and included a staff recommendation that both agreements be approved.

Although City Manager Chris Meyer explained that “City Council was not being asked to approve the building plans but just the encroachment,” how a reasonable decision could be made without accurate facts remains in question.On May 7, the day after City Council approval, the permit application was signed and approved in the engineering department . The wall has since been built. As part of the agreement, Florentine’s will pay 25 cents per sq-foot per month for use of the property for 10 years.  No fee is to be charged during the first year.

City Manager Chris Meyer, Development Services Department head Paul Dudley, and Director of Engineering Bob Hodson met with a few concerned citizens including both current and former members of the City’s Redevelopment Design Review Committee who would like to see the wall removed.

The wall meets “all applicable codes,” Hodson said, with nods from Meyer and Dudley, “specifically, the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act).”   Hodson indicated that the application also met with current guidelines that have been in place since 1994.

The Downtown Fullerton Outdoor Dining Guidelines are intended to protect the public interest while permitting private outdoor dining facilities on public property within the public right of way.

The Downtown Fullerton Outdoor Dining Encroachment Agreement asks the applicant to “Provide a brief description of the proposed street furniture and how it is designed to be compatible with the historic downtown surroundings in terms of color and materials.”  In this case, a copy of the Public Right-of-Way Excavation, Construction & Encroachment Application and Permit described the project simply as “Installing Patio on Sidewalk” for a fee of $111. Again, no mention of the wall.   Dudley agreed with the citizen suggestion that the wall could have at least been open work of wrought iron, but said the block wall was what Mr. Florentine wanted, and that is what the City Council gave him.

Asked why the issue had not come before the Redevelopment Design Review Committee [RDRC] for review, City Manager Chris Meyer said “The RDRC has no political power but acts only as an advisory body to the City Council.”

However, in this case, the RDRC was not given the opportunity to review or advise.

“It would have made no difference,” Dudley said. “This City Council would happily dismiss the entire committee.”

Author’s note: When I wrote this article, I had not yet discovered the outdoor dining application wherein Dudley gave Florentine permission for “Addition to building.”

8 replies »

  1. Correction** for clarity… is up to city government to know the shenanigans, and should represent Fullerton residents. Not lessees or lessors, they will claim ignorance, as we know too well. Self interest is ever present in Fullerton. No checks and balances here!

  2. The encroachment was always a cancelable lease with written agreement that owner would pay for restoration of the public right-of-way, and the lease at all times was not transferable. The new owner, an experienced businessman and property owner, did not ever apply for his own lease. he just went ahead and acted like it was his. It’s easier to get forgiveness than permission, right?

    • It shouldn’t be. And every person in planning/council knows this. Yet crickets prevail.

      It should not be up to the citizens to lessees, lessors or the city government honest. That is the root of Fullerton’s issues. NOBODY IS LOOKING OUT FOR RESIDENTS OR OWNERS OF FULLERTON!!!

  3. If the city made the closed door deal 20 years ago, then they should live with it. Shaking down the new landlord to try to fix their corrupt history doesn’t sit well with me. City should pay for it and any construction necessary if they want the 6ft back. But they are bankrupt? Shocker! We need new landlords to help beautify our city, not more sidewalk so homeless can set up camp and use as a restroom.

  4. I wrote all the details for The Observer back in 2003 and 2004. No one marched on city hall. As I recall, a few people piped up, but no follow-through. I have not seen any organized, focused work to change, improve Fullerton in the slightest. Fullertonians United For Futility is the best we can do.

    • Oh Hell, I piped up, real loud, too. I believe laws were ignored by Meyers and Dudley to permit this excrescence. The Florentine Gang did whatever they damn pleased. Pere etc Fils.

      • Exactly! Thanks for speaking up. As you see it didn’t really matter. My regrets indeed.

  5. Thanks for detailed article… However I think it’s decades too late.

    My thoughts…Just one of the many dirty secrets that Fullerton city Council and government back room deals that has been hidden from the citizens. For decades. Even when it reeks of dead fish and the citizens are screaming. City councils response is to ignore and “deny deny deny” and hope that everybody gets used to smelling dead fish.

    ……pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. People have been trying for decades to clean up Fullerton, it is impossible because there’s so many corrupt people that actually run the city from behind the scenes. The Fullerton PD needs to be converted to the sheriff, and anybody that’s been there more than 10 years needs to be gone. City development and planning dept needs to be wiped completely clean. Drain the swamp already.

    And Doug Chaffee is the one to hand out the Covid money? Do you smell it?

    It keeps going on decade after decade, it’s a Legacy at this point.